วันพฤหัสบดีที่ 17 พฤศจิกายน พ.ศ. 2559

Assessment of Thasap Model Project

       The results of academic service project assessment in Thasap sub-district (figure ), which was researched by CIPP model, were as follow:

1) C: Context
 Context was assessed by committees, it was found that overview assessment were at the high level (X= 3.86, S.D. = 0.96). The most subject which respondents assessed was suitability and consistency was project’s rationale, objectives and goal at the highest level (X = 4.22, S.D. = 0.97). Secondary, project atmosphere, such as environment, places etc., at the high level (X = 3.89, S.D. = 0.78).

2) I: Input
 Input was assessed by committees and project responsible. Committees’ assessment, it was found that overview assessment were at the high level (X= 3.37,      S.D. = 0.89). The most subject which respondents assessed suitability and consistency was quantity of personnel at the high level (X = 3.79, S.D. = 0.60). Secondary, project budget, at the high level (X = 3.89, S.D. = 0.33). And project responsible, it was found that overview assessment were at the high level (X= 3.62, S.D. = 0.63). The most subject which respondents assessed suitability and consistency was quantity of personnel at the high level (X = 4.11, S.D. = 0.60). Secondary, project budget, at the medium level         (X= 3.30, S.D. = 1.05).

3) P: Process
 Process was assessed by project responsible, it was found that overview assessment were at the high level (X= 3.41, S.D. = 1.01). The most subject which respondents assessed suitability and consistency was completeness of activities procedures at the high level (X = 3.61, S.D. = 0.93). Secondary, activities planning at the high level  (X = 3.58, S.D. = 1.03).

4) P: Product
 Product was assessed by attendees; include school teachers and administrators, students, youth groups, general people, and career, farmer, and elderly groups.  1) School teachers and administrators assessed overview at the high level (X= 3.79, S.D. = 0.76). The most subject which respondents assessed satisfaction was knowledge and ability of keynote speaker at the high level (X = 3.83, S.D. = 0.82). Secondary, building network at the high level (X = 3.83, S.D. = 0.68). 2) Students assessed overview at the high level      (X = 4.07, S.D. = 0.89). The most subject which respondents assessed was survey need of before doing project the highest level (X = 4.20, S.D. = 0.86). Secondary, knowledge and ability of keynote speaker at the high level (X = 4.09, S.D. = 0.91). 3) Youth groups assessed overview at the high level (X = 4.35, S.D. = 0.68). The most subject which respondents assessed was overview satisfaction at the high level (X = 4.30, S.D. = 0.69). Secondary, building network at the highest level (X = 4.27, S.D. = 0.68). 4) General people assessed overview at the highest level (X = 4.02, S.D. = 0.65). The most subject which respondents assessed was utilization knowledge from project at the highest level    (X = 4.30, S.D. = 0.69). Secondary, processes and procedures of activities at the highest level (X = 4.33, S.D. = 0.71). And 5) career, farmer, and elderly groups assessed overview at the high level (X = 4.17, S.D. = 0.72). The most subject which respondents assessed was overview satisfaction at the highest level (X = 4.31, S.D. = 0.70). Secondary, knowledge and ability of keynote speaker at the highest level (X = 4.26, S.D. = 0.71).


ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น